SIA 2026 · Pisa, 16–18 settembre 2026

Digital Ecosystems as Levers for Agroecological Redesign

Contributo di doliFARM al 55° Convegno Nazionale della Società Italiana di Agronomia — «Sistemi di produzione agricola nell'era della transizione eco-digitale», Sessione III, Ri-progettazione dei sistemi di produzione agricola.

Scarica il poster (PDF)Vai alla bibliografia

Di cosa parla il lavoro

Il contributo indaga il ruolo degli ecosistemi digitali nella ri-progettazione agroecologica dei sistemi di produzione: come gli strumenti digitali possano sostenere il coordinamento tra aziende agricole, biodistretti e comunità, e a quali condizioni la digitalizzazione rafforzi l'autonomia di chi produce invece di creare nuove dipendenze.

La dimostrazione applicativa si basa su doliFARM. La valutazione dei futuri sviluppi è dichiarata formativa: senza controfattuale non si parla di efficacia misurata.

In brief. The contribution examines the role of digital ecosystems in the agroecological redesign of production systems: how digital tools can support coordination between farms, bio-districts and communities, and under what conditions digitisation strengthens producers' autonomy instead of creating new dependencies. The applied demonstration is based on doliFARM. The evaluation of future developments is stated as formative: without a counterfactual, no claim of measured effectiveness is made.

Scrivici per parlarne →

Bibliography

19 references, in alphabetical order. Every entry has been verified against Crossref.

  1. Anggraeni E.W., Handayati Y., Novani S. (2022). Improving local food systems through the coordination of agriculture supply chain actors. Sustainability, 14(6), 3281.doi.org/10.3390/su14063281
  2. Castella J.-C., Lu J., Friis C., Bruun T.B., Cole R., Junquera V., Kenney-Lazar M., Mahanty S., Ornetsmüller C., Pravalprukskul P., Vagneron I. (2023). Beyond the boom-bust cycle: an interdisciplinary framework for analysing crop booms. Global Environmental Change, 80, 102651.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2023.102651
  3. Dittmer K.M., Burns S., Shelton S., Wollenberg E. (2024). Principles for socially inclusive digital tools for smallholder farmers: a guide. Version 2. Agroecological TRANSITIONS (ATDT). Cali, Colombia: Alliance of Bioversity International & CIAT, 22 p.hdl.handle.net/10568/148722
  4. Fanzo J., Haddad L., Schneider K.R., Béné C., Covic N.M., Guarin A., Herforth A.W., Herrero M., Sumaila U.R. et al. (2021). Viewpoint: rigorous monitoring is necessary to guide food system transformation in the countdown to the 2030 global goals. Food Policy, 104, 102163.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2021.102163
  5. Hackfort S. (2023). Unlocking sustainability? The power of corporate lock-ins and how they shape digital agriculture in Germany. Journal of Rural Studies, 101, 103065.doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2023.103065
  6. Lai M.B., Vergamini D., Brunori G. (2025). Food supply chain: a framework for the governance of digital traceability. Foods, 14(12), 2032.doi.org/10.3390/foods14122032
  7. Lee H., Van Cayseele P. (2024). Market power, markup volatility and the role of cooperatives in the food value chain: evidence from Italy. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 51(3), 844–894.doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbac001
  8. Migliorini P., Gkisakis V., Gonzalvez V., Raigón M.D., Bàrberi P. (2018). Agroecology in Mediterranean Europe: genesis, state and perspectives. Sustainability, 10(8), 2724.doi.org/10.3390/su10082724
  9. Migliorini P., Lieblein G. (2016). Facilitating transformation and competence development in sustainable agriculture university education: an experiential and action oriented approach. Sustainability, 8(12), 1243.doi.org/10.3390/su8121243
  10. Mitra S., Mookherjee D., Torero M., Visaria S. (2018). Asymmetric information and middleman margins: an experiment with Indian potato farmers. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 100(1), 1–13.doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_00699
  11. Nes K., Colen L., Ciaian P. (2024). Market structure, power, and the unfair trading practices directive in the EU food sector: a review of indicators. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, 53(3), 454–477.doi.org/10.1017/age.2024.16
  12. Packer G., Zanasi C. (2023). Comparing social sustainability assessment indicators and tools for bio-districts: building an analytical framework. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 7, 1229505.doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2023.1229505
  13. Poponi S., Arcese G., Mosconi E.M., Pacchera F., Martucci O., Elmo G.C. (2021). Multi-actor governance for a circular economy in the agri-food sector: bio-districts. Sustainability, 13(9), 4718.doi.org/10.3390/su13094718
  14. Rastorgueva N., Bassignana C.F., Angarita E., Fasso A., Hassink J., Goris M., Schmutz U., Conroy J., Dinç S., Wezel A., Migliorini P. (2025). Agroecological living labs as entry points for transition towards sustainable food systems: a novel framework for the evaluation of living labs at different scales. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems, 50(1), 130–163.doi.org/10.1080/21683565.2025.2477215
  15. Ruder S.-L., Wittman H. (2025). Agricultural data governance from the ground up: exploring data justice with agri-food movements. Big Data & Society, 12(1), 20539517251330182.doi.org/10.1177/20539517251330182
  16. Sauvagerd M., Mayer M., Hartmann M. (2024). Digital platforms in the agricultural sector: dynamics of oligopolistic platformisation. Big Data & Society, 11(4), 20539517241306365.doi.org/10.1177/20539517241306365
  17. Stefanovic L., Agbolosoo-Mensah O.A. (2023). Biodistricts as a tool to revitalize rural territories and communities: insights from the biodistrict Cilento. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 7, 1267985.doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2023.1267985
  18. Sturla A., Viganò L., Vassallo M., Belliggiano A. (2024). Mission, (self)-perception and role in localized food systems of Italian biodistricts: insights from a Delphi survey. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 8, 1433261.doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2024.1433261
  19. Zanasi C., Basile S., Paoletti F., Pugliese P., Rota C. (2020). Design of a monitoring tool for eco-regions. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 4, 536392.doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2020.536392